From tcobbs at gmail.com Mon Oct 1 20:43:29 2007 From: tcobbs at gmail.com (Travis Cobbs) Date: Mon Oct 1 20:43:34 2007 Subject: [Ldraw-content] List indentation Message-ID: Lists on ldraw.org don't seem to be indented in a way that is conducive of easy reading. Specifically, the style sheet apparently has lines after the first set to have the same indent level as the first line's bullet, instead of indenting them to line up with the start of the text on the first line. Is this intentional? If not, can someone fix it? For an example of what I'm talking about, just look here: http://www.ldraw.org/Article383.html Thanks. --Travis Cobbs -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mail.peeron.com/pipermail/ldraw-content/attachments/20071001/ffa122db/attachment.html From tcobbs at gmail.com Mon Oct 1 20:45:46 2007 From: tcobbs at gmail.com (Travis Cobbs) Date: Mon Oct 1 20:45:51 2007 Subject: [Ldraw-content] Login cookie timeout Message-ID: The login cookie timeout (when you check the "Remember me" check box during login) seems to be set much lower than I would expect. (Is it 1 month?) Was this done intentionally? If not, is there any chance it could be increased to a bigger number? Thanks. --Travis Cobbs -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mail.peeron.com/pipermail/ldraw-content/attachments/20071001/a9f48616/attachment.html From orion at ldraw.org Mon Oct 1 22:46:18 2007 From: orion at ldraw.org (Orion Pobursky) Date: Mon Oct 1 22:47:03 2007 Subject: [Ldraw-content] List indentation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <4701B0FA.9050104@ldraw.org> Travis Cobbs wrote: > Lists on ldraw.org don't seem to be indented in a way that is conducive of > easy reading. Specifically, the style sheet apparently has lines after the > first set to have the same indent level as the first line's bullet, instead > of indenting them to line up with the start of the text on the first line. > Is this intentional? If not, can someone fix it? > > For an example of what I'm talking about, just look here: > > http://www.ldraw.org/Article383.html > > Thanks. > > --Travis Cobbs Fixed. -Orion -- We don't stop playing because we grow old; we grow old because we stop playing -George Bernard Shaw From orion at ldraw.org Mon Oct 1 22:48:10 2007 From: orion at ldraw.org (Orion Pobursky) Date: Mon Oct 1 22:48:55 2007 Subject: [Ldraw-content] Login cookie timeout In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <4701B16A.3060602@ldraw.org> Travis Cobbs wrote: > The login cookie timeout (when you check the "Remember me" check box during > login) seems to be set much lower than I would expect. (Is it 1 month?) Was > this done intentionally? If not, is there any chance it could be increased > to a bigger number? > > Thanks. I think 90's OK. I've changed it to that. -Orion -- We don't stop playing because we grow old; we grow old because we stop playing -George Bernard Shaw From tcobbs at gmail.com Tue Oct 2 00:10:40 2007 From: tcobbs at gmail.com (Travis Cobbs) Date: Tue Oct 2 00:10:44 2007 Subject: [Ldraw-content] Login cookie timeout In-Reply-To: <4701B16A.3060602@ldraw.org> References: <4701B16A.3060602@ldraw.org> Message-ID: Thanks. Did you mean 90 days? I'm not sure what "90's" means. --Travis On 10/1/07, Orion Pobursky wrote: > > Travis Cobbs wrote: > > The login cookie timeout (when you check the "Remember me" check box > during > > login) seems to be set much lower than I would expect. (Is it 1 > month?) Was > > this done intentionally? If not, is there any chance it could be > increased > > to a bigger number? > > > > Thanks. > > I think 90's OK. I've changed it to that. > -Orion > > -- > We don't stop playing because we grow old; > we grow old because we stop playing > -George Bernard Shaw > _______________________________________________ > Ldraw-content mailing list > Ldraw-content@ldraw.org > http://mail.peeron.com/mailman/listinfo/ldraw-content > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mail.peeron.com/pipermail/ldraw-content/attachments/20071001/d5816014/attachment.html From tcobbs at gmail.com Tue Oct 2 00:20:10 2007 From: tcobbs at gmail.com (Travis Cobbs) Date: Tue Oct 2 00:20:14 2007 Subject: [Ldraw-content] List indentation In-Reply-To: <4701B0FA.9050104@ldraw.org> References: <4701B0FA.9050104@ldraw.org> Message-ID: Thanks. Oddly enough, the bullets are now pushed left in Firefox, instead of having the whole list indented slightly like you would expect. IE 7 makes them look like would be expected, so I then checked Opera and Safari, and they both look like Firefox. Based on Opera's reputation as being fairly standards-compliant, I'm guessing the funky rendering is the correct one. I don't know enough about CSS to give you any hints on how to fix it, unfortunately. --Travis On 10/1/07, Orion Pobursky wrote: > > Travis Cobbs wrote: > > Lists on ldraw.org don't seem to be indented in a way that is conducive > of > > easy reading. Specifically, the style sheet apparently has lines after > the > > first set to have the same indent level as the first line's bullet, > instead > > of indenting them to line up with the start of the text on the first > line. > > Is this intentional? If not, can someone fix it? > > > > For an example of what I'm talking about, just look here: > > > > http://www.ldraw.org/Article383.html > > > > Thanks. > > > > --Travis Cobbs > > Fixed. > > -Orion > > -- > We don't stop playing because we grow old; > we grow old because we stop playing > -George Bernard Shaw > _______________________________________________ > Ldraw-content mailing list > Ldraw-content@ldraw.org > http://mail.peeron.com/mailman/listinfo/ldraw-content > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mail.peeron.com/pipermail/ldraw-content/attachments/20071001/7dbccc18/attachment.html